I am working as Senior Architect eXperience Engineering (front-end architect) with Publicis Sapient. Having more than 15 years of experience in the area of jQuery, JavaScript, HTML5, and CSS3. My expertise is to work on full stack-based projects using NodeJS and ReactJS.
I'm showing recent 6 blog posts, but there might be more!
Next.js has quickly become one of the most dominant frameworks for frontend fullstack development. It's great for shipping MVPs fast, but here's the big question, is it equally good for production-grade applications? Let's break it down and talk about the trade-offs you might face when using the Next.js stack.
You might wonder why you should care about the size of your Docker images. Here are a few compelling reasons...
FFmpeg is a powerful command-line tool to handle all your media needs. Use it to quickly convert formats, create GIFs, resize images, trim videos, and extract audio right from your terminal. It's the fast, free, and scriptable alternative to heavy video editing software.
Companies are shifting away from Next.js because of concerns about increased complexity, vendor lock-in, performance limitations at scale, and the flexibility offered by alternative frameworks like Astro, Remix, or pure React solutions with Vite. While Next.js remains a powerful tool, it's not always the best choice for all projects.
In the world of web development, the architecture of your project can significantly influence its scalability, maintainability, and performance.
Styling choices in Next.js can be confusing. Some prefer CSS modules, while others opt for the popular Tailwind CSS.